Back to Top


Mandatory Transvaginal Ultrasounds: Coming Soon to a State Near You

As my colleague Maya Dusenbery noted a few days ago, Virginia's new law requiring every woman to undergo an ultrasound before she can get an abortion is still terrible, even if women can opt-out of the transvaginal probe portion.

Most abortions take place within 12 weeks after a woman becomes pregnant. And if the woman has been pregnant for eight weeks or less, conducting an ultrasound generally requires the doctor to insert a probe in a woman's vagina in order to actually see or hear anything. Virginia is not alone in its desire to subject women to invasive probes before they are allowed to get an abortion, a legally protected medical procedure. Twenty states already have laws dictating rules for ultrasounds, according to the Guttmacher Institute. Here are seven other states that have advanced similar measures in the last year:

Alabama: State Sen. Clay Scofield offered his own ultrasound measure a few weeks ago, which included a penalty of up to 10 years in jail and a $15,000 fine if doctors don't carry out the procedure. But Schofieldbacked off component of the bill that would have required doctors to stick a probe in women's vaginas, instead offering that a woman could undergo the "method of ultrasound that she would be more comfortable with."

Idaho: State Sen. Chuck Winder (R-Boise) has introduced yet another bill requiring an ultrasound . . .

Source : Mother Jones : Read the rest of the story here:

Virginia’s Proposed Ultrasound Law Is an Abomination

Feb 20, 2012 - Tags:

Never mind that the evidence indicates that women forced to see ultrasound images opt to terminate anyhow. According to the American Independent, a new study by Tracy Weitz, assistant professor in the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences at the University of California, San Francisco, shows that “viewing an ultrasound is not an indication that a woman will cancel her scheduled procedure, regardless of what emotional response the sonogram elicits.” Weitz summarized her findings in 2010 when she said that “women do not have abortions because they believe the fetus is not a human or because they don’t know the truth.”

Of course, the bill is unconstitutional. The whole point of the new abortion bans is to force the Supreme Court to reverse Roe v. Wade. It’s unconstitutional to place an “undue burden” on a woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy, although it’s anyone’s guess what, precisely, that means. One would be inclined to suspect, however, that unwanted penetration with a medical device violates either the undue burden test or the right to bodily autonomy. But that’s the other catch in this bill. Proponents seem to be of the view that once a woman has allowed a man to penetrate her body once, her right to bodily autonomy has ended.

During the floor debate on Tuesday, Del. C. Todd Gilbert announced that “in the vast majority of these cases, these [abortions] are matters of lifestyle convenience.” (He has since apologized.) Virginia Democrat Del. David Englin, who opposes the bill, has said Gilbert’s statement “is in line with previous Republican comments on the issue,” recalling one conversation with a GOP lawmaker who told him that women had already made the decision to be "vaginally penetrated when they got pregnant." (I confirmed with Englin that this quote was accurate.)*


Source : Slate : Read the full story here :

Staples Co-Founder Claims Allowing Women To Breastfeed At Work Will ‘Kill Jobs’

Feb 09, 2012 - Tags:

Staunch Republican donor and co-founder of Staples, Tom Stemberg, has  a grave concern that might just throw the fragile economic recovery into the into a precipitous tailspin: breastfeeding. Indeed, the ever-so menacing and communist practice of a new mother providing natural enrichment, as well as, bonding with her newborn child (maybe because she doesn’t charge the kid a fee for service?).

Not surprisingly, Stemberg is a longtime supporter of policies of Casino capitalist Republicans like Mitt Romney, and he’s incessantly complaining about how Obama’s HCR  will force him to abide by such onerous laws as providing what he called “lactation stations” for new moms who need to breastfeed at work. So much for thinking that lactation station was a bosomy all-female rock group from the late 70s.

Source : Addicting Info : Read the whole story here.


Bishops are supporting a f*cking fine

So far, I have no takers on the question of why it's okay for the city of NYC to force private buses that serve the public to stop making women sit in the back of the bus, but acceptable for Catholic-owned hospitals and universities to do the same thing by requiring women to pay out of pocket for preventive health services. I have my own theories about this, the main being that contraception use is private and so there's not a shocking visible representation of how unfair it is to treat women's medical care so differently than men's medical care. Which is why I think it's time to come up with one.

Basically, what the Catholic bishops are doing is demanding a right to fine female employees of Catholic-owned institutions for fucking.

After all, that's what this amounts to, a fucking fine that's leveled against women.*

Source : Pandagon : Read the rest of the story here:

Subscribe to RSS - women
  • Popular
  • Latest
  • Tags
By Salmar Rushdie WE find it easier, in these confused times...
Tuesday, May 7, 2013 - 11:35
The U.S. military launched an experimental hypersonic aircra...
Tuesday, May 7, 2013 - 11:04
VATICAN CITY (The Borowitz Report)—Pope Emeritus Benedict’s...
Sunday, May 5, 2013 - 07:43
A new study presented on Saturday challenges the assumption...
Sunday, May 5, 2013 - 07:38

Follow Me

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Vimeo